Presolar Grain Database

We’ve moved the presolar grain database to a group-editable Google Sheets format in an effort to keep it up-to-date and error free. My summer student last year Drew did a great job fixing a lot of errors in the database. If any of my esteemed colleagues would like to help maintain the database please let me know!

Presolar Grain Searching

This is the type of data we look at to identify isotopically anomalous presolar grains (micrometer sized dust that formed around other stars before the Solar System’s formation).

The left image shows the ratio of oxygen-17 to oxygen-16 in a 10×10 micron region of a primitive meteorite. You can see one small grain on the left is enriched in oxygen-17 by ~2000 per mil, which means it has twice as much oxygen-17 as terrestrial matter. On the right is the plot on the left divided by the statistical uncertainty of each pixel. This shows that the oxygen-17 anomaly is indeed statistically significant, close to 20-sigma.

MetSoc Abstracts

We have submitted abstracts to the Meteoritical Society society. This year the meeting will be held in Hokkaido, Japan. “MetSoc” is my favorite week of the year!

Color maps

Data visualization is cool and I’ve been thinking about better ways to visualize backscattered electron images of meteorite thin sections. Scanning electron microscopes can acquire these images with sixteen bits of intensity information (pixels have values between 0 and 65,535), but for display we’re pretty much stuck with eight bits (0-255). So we’re throwing away a lot of information and possibly missing some subtle variations of contrast by converting to 8-bit grayscale. One solution is to map the 16 bits of grayscale values to 24 bits of color values. This will give us more unique color values. But how should we do this mapping? That is the question!

Below is the same backscattered electron image for six different color maps: (from left to right): gray (256 unique 8-bit color values — of course!), inferno (904 unique 8-bit color values), magma (778), parula (963), viridis (688), plasma (686).

Click to enlarge
gray inferno magma parula viridis plasma

I think my favorite is the third from the left: magma. I prefer mapping black to black for the zero value, but maybe I am too stodgy. Unfortunately magma has fewer unique 16-bit -> 8-bit color values than inferno and parula. However inferno most easily allows one to distinguish iron sulfide from iron metal which is important and certainly difficult to do in the grayscale image. (Another idea is to use grayscale mapping but have a dynamic black point, white point, and gamma.)

Bonus: can you find the SIMS spot?

This is my favorite meteorite Acfer 094.


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
clearvars
close all
% Color maps from:
% https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/51986-perceptually-uniform-colormaps

A=imread('~/Downloads/Acfer-TEMP/070_020.png');
pxx=size(A,1);
pxy=size(A,2);

pp1=gray(2^16);
pp2=inferno(2^16);
pp3=magma(2^16);
pp4=parula(2^16);
pp5=viridis(2^16);
pp6=plasma(2^16);

A1=uint8(reshape(255*pp1(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));
A2=uint8(reshape(255*pp2(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));
A3=uint8(reshape(255*pp3(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));
A4=uint8(reshape(255*pp4(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));
A5=uint8(reshape(255*pp5(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));
A6=uint8(reshape(255*pp6(A+1,:),pxx,pxy,3));

image([A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6])
axis image
axis off
imwrite([A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6],'colormap_16bit_test.png');

fprintf('Unique colors in gray: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp1)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in inferno: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp2)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in magma: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp3)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in parula: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp4)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in viridis: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp5)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in plasma: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp6)),'rows'),1))

LPSC 2019

We have returned from the 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference! It was a great conference, highlights include a screening of the Apollo 11 movie (it was spectacular), major announcements, meeting up with old friends, lots of fantastic science talks (it’s hard to pick a favorite but this is certainly a contender), and many discussions about future science projects. It’s good to be back in St. Louis though, and back to teaching!