Rocks from Space by O. Richard Norton is one of my favorite books, a well-written introduction to meteorites. Nate Conway wrote a very nice summary which I have posted here.
These might be the most beautiful rock samples I’ve had the pleasure of studying: Cumberland Falls (aubrite), expertly prepared in thick section by Laurence Garvie at Arizona State University.
Wash U made this cool video which features our lab in celebration of the 50th anniversary of Apollo 11.
Six members of our lab presented work at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society in Sapporo, Japan. It was a most fantastic conference. Our St. Louis group presented some very exciting results. Now it’s back to work for the rest of the summer!
Yesterday Brendan successfully defended his Ph.D. The title of his dissertation was “Correlated SEM, FIB, and TEM studies of Material Collected by the NASA Stardust Spacecraft”. He talked about all the cool science he’s done while studying some of the most challenging and important extraterrestrial materials in our collection. Congratulations Brendan!
We’ve moved the presolar grain database to a group-editable Google Sheets format in an effort to keep it up-to-date and error free. My summer student last year Drew did a great job fixing a lot of errors in the database. If any of my esteemed colleagues would like to help maintain the database please let me know!
This is the type of data we look at to identify isotopically anomalous presolar grains (micrometer sized dust that formed around other stars before the Solar System’s formation).
We have submitted abstracts to the Meteoritical Society society. This year the meeting will be held in Hokkaido, Japan. “MetSoc” is my favorite week of the year!
Data visualization is cool and I’ve been thinking about better ways to visualize backscattered electron images of meteorite thin sections. Scanning electron microscopes can acquire these images with sixteen bits of intensity information (pixels have values between 0 and 65,535), but for display we’re pretty much stuck with eight bits (0-255). So we’re throwing away a lot of information and possibly missing some subtle variations of contrast by converting to 8-bit grayscale. One solution is to map the 16 bits of grayscale values to 24 bits of color values. This will give us more unique color values. But how should we do this mapping? That is the question!
Below is the same backscattered electron image for six different color maps: (from left to right): gray (256 unique 8-bit color values — of course!), inferno (904 unique 8-bit color values), magma (778), parula (963), viridis (688), plasma (686).
I think my favorite is the third from the left: magma. I prefer mapping black to black for the zero value, but maybe I am too stodgy. Unfortunately magma has fewer unique 16-bit -> 8-bit color values than inferno and parula. However inferno most easily allows one to distinguish iron sulfide from iron metal which is important and certainly difficult to do in the grayscale image. (Another idea is to use grayscale mapping but have a dynamic black point, white point, and gamma.)
Bonus: can you find the SIMS spot?
This is my favorite meteorite Acfer 094.
% Color maps from:
image([A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6])
imwrite([A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6],'colormap_16bit_test.png');
fprintf('Unique colors in gray: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp1)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in inferno: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp2)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in magma: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp3)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in parula: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp4)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in viridis: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp5)),'rows'),1))
fprintf('Unique colors in plasma: %d\n',size(unique(uint8(round(255*pp6)),'rows'),1))